Camera Forum

QuestionPolariser on wet autumn woodland, yes or no?

Started by gemma_beckett, 22 Sep 2026. 6 replies, 183 views

Gear in this topic: Canon EOS RP

gemma_beckett
Member

Planning a few autumn walks once the colour gets going, probably Westonbirt and up around the Wye Valley in October. I always have a polariser on (it's the one filter I'd never be without!) but someone in my camera club said I should take it off in woodland because it "kills" the colour on the leaves.

That seems backwards to me? I thought cutting the glare on wet leaves was the whole point. I'm on an RP with the 24-105 STM, so not loads of light to play with under the trees either. Do you leave yours on or not?

G

darkslide
ModeratorModerator

Your club friend's half right. On wet leaves a polariser is magic, it cuts the sheen and the colour comes through. Where it goes wrong is if you crank it to maximum with a bright sky showing through the canopy and the blue goes patchy, or if you're losing a stop and a half when the light's already poor. I rotate it while watching the EVF and stop when the leaves look best, which is rarely all the way.

gemma_beckett
Member

Thank you all, that's reassuring. So it's more about how much I turn it than on or off. Tripod is a fair point, I usually leave it in the car because of the weight... I'll try the higher ISO first and see how the RP copes under the trees. G

gemma_beckett
Member

Back from Westonbirt! Polariser on but only turned about halfway like darkslide said, ISO 3200 on the RP under the maples and honestly it's fine, much better than I expected. The acers were only just starting to turn so I might go back in a fortnight. Thanks again everyone. G

Related topics