Matsuda
Member
- Joined
- 10 Jan 2026
- Posts
- 6
- Location
- Sacramento, California
Recent posts
- R6 Mark III owners, do you actually use the 40fps?
The III has high frequency anti-flicker for LED lighting, worth a try if you ever upgrade. I haven't tested it in a gym myself though, the stadium lights have been fine.
Post #5, in Canon - r6 for hockey, upgrade to used r6 ii or new r8 ii?
If the budget stretches, R6 III. I came from the R6 for sport and tracking in traffic is a big step up, it stays on the right player when two of them cross. Rolling shutter is much better too if you…
Post #3, in Buying Advice - R6 V with no viewfinder and no mechanical shutter. Has Canon lost the plot?
If the readout is anything like the III then rolling shutter won't be an issue for video. Would like to see numbers though. I shoot a bit of video on the side at basketball and the R6 III's…
Post #21, in Canon - gym basketball - 70-200 2.8 not cutting it?
Same deal at my daughter's volleyball. 85 is too short from the baseline in a big gym, fine from the end line. 135 f/2 used if you can find one. With the 70-200 I'm at 1/640, f/2.8 and ISO 12800 in…
Post #3, in Lenses - R6 Mark III is official. R6 II owners, are you upgrading?
Couldn't wait that long. Late here but I've had mine since mid December, came from the original R6. AF on basketball is noticeably better and I've mostly stopped worrying about rolling shutter on…
Post #18, in Canon