Camera Forum

DiscussionPanasonic 'exit' rumours again. Is MFT dying or just shrinking?

Started by fen_and_field, 21 Aug 2026. 12 replies, 509 views

Gear in this topic: Lumix GH7, OM System OM-1, M.Zuiko 300mm f/4 IS PRO

fen_and_field
Member

The rumour sites have Panasonic doing an APS-C L-mount body and, depending on who you read, stepping back from Micro Four Thirds altogether. I'll believe it when I see it.

But it does raise the question for those of us with a bag of MFT glass. I photograph birds on an OM-1 with the 300 f/4, and there's nothing else at that weight that gets me the reach. I'm not moving. I'm interested in whether anyone here actually is.

Dreich
Senior member

Proper tired of this one. OM System is MFT only, so even if Panasonic walked away tomorrow the mount doesn't vanish. And there's a decade of second hand lenses out there that'll keep working long after any of us have stopped caring.

I'll be stood on a wet hill in Glencoe with my OM-1 II whilst the rest of you argue about it...

ben_carrick
Member

As a Panasonic L-mount user, an APS-C L body makes total sense for them. The L-mount has Sigma's APS-C lenses already sitting there, and they'd have a direct answer to the a6700 and the X-S20 without needing a whole new lens line.

Doesn't mean they drop the GH line. The GH7 is still the best small video body going imo, the internal ProRes RAW, the cooling, 32-bit float audio with the XLR module. Nobody else does all of that in that size, and the video crowd buying GH bodies aren't going to suddenly want a bigger sensor and bigger lenses. If anything goes, it's the cheap G bodies, not the GH.

And honestly, if they did it, I'd probably buy one as a B-cam. Small, L-mount, cheap. That's exactly the gap in my bag.

ellie_v
Member

reckon the people who say mft is dead have never carried a full frame 600 up a hill. i did that once with my mates kit in the Grampians, never again, my shoulder still hasnt forgiven me. APS-C is all most people need anyway and MFT is basically APS-C with smaller lenses so im on your side here

salticid
Member

Depth of field at macro distances on MFT is a feature, not a bug (fight me). At 1:1 on full frame you're working with a sliver of focus so thin that a jumping spider's front eyes are sharp and its back eyes (the other four, the creepy ones) are mush, and you have to stop down so far that diffraction eats you alive. On MFT I get roughly two stops more depth for the same framing at the same aperture, which in real life means a whole Phidippus audax (the bold jumper, my nemesis) in focus at f/8 instead of f/16.

The downside (there's always one) is that you hit diffraction a stop or so earlier on MFT, so f/11 is about my limit before things go soft. But that's still more usable depth than f/22 on full frame, and I'm not carrying a 100mm macro the size of a coke can.

Plus in-camera focus stacking on the OM-5 means I don't even have to think about it for the static stuff.

I'd keep shooting it even if they stopped making bodies tomorrow. (They won't.) (Probably.)

TomekKRK
Member

I think real question is if new people buy into MFT. Old users will stay anyway, they have the lenses. New buyers in my local shop all go to full frame now, even complete beginners, because Z5 II and A7 IV used are not so expensive anymore. A system that only keeps old users slowly gets smaller, this is what 'shrinking' means.

wildatlantic
Member

Weather sealed MFT is the only thing I'd trust on the west coast. Salt, rain, wind off the Atlantic, the lot. If it ends, it ends, I'll shoot mine till it dies and then buy a used one and shoot that till it dies too

Related topics

  1. ShowcaseWinter on the Ouse Washes
    fen_and_field, in Showcase · 3 replies